Investigating the Use of Intercultural Communication in Addressing Racism During Jury Selection Processes in Trials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52152//RCR.V14.5Keywords:
Intercultural Communication, Jury Selection, Racial Bias, Framing Theory, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
Racial prejudice during the selection of jurors continues to impair the impartiality and fairness of the legal system, with far-reaching effects on judicial decisions as well as public confidence. Though legal reforms like Batson v. Kentucky have sought to de-emphasize explicit discrimination, unconscious racial prejudices remain, frequently unalleviated by conventional legal systems. This research examines how intercultural communication approaches based on communication theories of framing theory, narrative persuasion, and critical discourse analysis can help address systemic racial differences in jury formation proceedings. Through redefining the problem from a legal perspective to a communication-oriented research inquiry, this research addresses how juror decision-making is shaped by cultural stories, cognitive biases, and mediation representation of race and justice. Following a qualitative approach, the current research utilizes a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) that adheres to the PRISMA guidelines. The 50 identified studies yielded eight that qualified and were included based on inclusion criteria and analyzed via thematic analysis. The results identify three main themes: (1) the persistent persistence of racial discrimination in jury formation throughout jurisdictions; (2) the contribution of intercultural communication to providing culturally competent juridical atmospheres; and (3) the effect of structural reforms, which include intercultural training and diverse compositions of juries, to induce fairness. Moreover, this research compares global outlook, examining jury selection procedures and communication-oriented interventions within Europe, South America, and Asia. The implications support institutional incorporation of intercultural communication tactics towards countering racial bias and increasing the legitimacy of legal decision-making world-wide.
References
Breger, M. L. (2018). Making the invisible visible: Exploring implicit bias, judicial diversity, and the bench trial. U. Rich. L. Rev.,53, 1039.
Banaji, M. R., Fiske, S. T., & Massey, D. S. (2021). Systemic racism: individuals and interactions, institutions and society.Cognitive research: principles and implications, 6(1), 82.
Capulong, E. R., King-Ries, A., & Mills, M. (2021). Antiracism, reflection, and professional identity.Hastings Race & Poverty LJ,18, 3.
Citro, C. F., Dabady, M., & Blank, R. M. (Eds.). (2004).Measuring racial discrimination. National Academies Press.
Conklin, T. J. (2022). The end of purposeful discrimination: The shift to an objective Batson standard. BCL Rev., 63, 1037.
Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & De Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them. Human reproduction, 31 (3), 498-501.
Hladik, J. (2016). Assessing multicultural competence of helping-profession students. Multicultural Perspectives, 18(1), 42-47.
Holden, L. (Ed.). (2011). Cultural expertise and litigation: Patterns, conflicts, narratives. Routledge.
Holland, B. (2020). Confronting the Bias Dichotomy in Jury Selection. La. L. Rev.,81, 165.
Hunt, J. S. (2015). Race, ethnicity, and culture in jury decision making.Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11(1), 269-288.
Johnson, J. P., Lenartowicz, T., & Apud, S. (2006). Cross-cultural competence in international business: Toward a definition and a model.Journal of international business studies, 37(4), 525-543.
Kaplan, M. F., & Martín, A. M. (2013). Understanding world jury systems through social psychological research. Psychology Press.
Kay, F., & Gorman, E. (2008). Women in the legal profession.Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 4(1), 299-332.
Koester, J., & Lustig, M. W. (2015). Intercultural communication competence: Theory, measurement, and application. International journal of intercultural relations, 48, 20-21.
Kirshenbaum, J. M., & Miller, M. K. (2021). Judges’ experiences with mitigating jurors’ implicit biases. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,28(5), 683-693.
Madaan, A. (2016). Cultural Competency and the Practice of Law in the 21st Century.Prob. & Prop., 30, 29.
Malhotra, P. (2024). The rise of passive investing: a systematic literature review applying PRISMA framework.Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 8(1), 95-125.
Mitchell, T. L., Haw, R. M., Pfeifer, J. E., & Meissner, C. A. (2005). Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: A meta-analytic review of defendant treatment.Law and human behavior, 29, 621-637.
Procaccini, D. J. (2011). What We Have Here is a Failure to Communicate: An Approach for Evaluating Credibility in America's Multilingual Courtrooms. BC Third World LJ, 31, 163.
Rose, M. R., Casarez, R. S., & Gutierrez, C. M. (2018). Jury pool underrepresentation in the modern era: Evidence from federal courts.Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 15(2), 378-405.
Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2001). White juror bias: An investigation of prejudice against Black defendants in the American courtroom. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 201.
Sommers, S. R., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Race and jury selection: Psychological perspectives on the peremptory challenge debate.American Psychologist, 63(6), 527.
Sorrells, K. (2020). Intercultural communication: Globalization and social justice. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Shyman, E. (2015). Toward a globally sensitive definition of inclusive education based in social justice.International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 62(4), 351-362.
Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2019). News framing theory and research. InMedia effects(pp. 51-68). Routledge.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of planning education and research, 39(1), 93-112.
Yang, Y., Guyll, M., & Madon, S. (2017). The interrogation decision-making model: A general theoretical framework for confessions.Law and Human Behavior, 41(1), 80.
Zhao, J., & Rogalin, C. L. (2024). Discrimination in Sentencing: Showing Remorse and the Intersection of Race and Gender.Social Psychology Quarterly, 87(4), 309-332.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The philosophy of the journal is to be open and to make all articles accessible. It is our belief that open access is a must in the future of science.
Authors who publish with RCR accept a slightly modified Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
You, as author, retain the copyrights for your paper, but the Review of Communication Research is granted exclusivity for publication of the article. The agreement allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and publication in this journal. We do not want third parties to make a commercial use of the article, unless we agree it with authors.
The journal will run an open review process as well as a traditional peer review process.
When the manuscript is accepted for publication, it will get a doi number and get available online to facilitate early citation.
The journal will post the published article to many public repositories for further diffusion and permanence.
You, as author, are permitted and encouraged to post your work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on your website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
If you have any doubts, please, contact the editor: editor@rcommunication.org
Many thanks for submitting your work to this journal.
